Tuesday, February 26, 2008

ENERGY: Turn off unused appliances when not in use



Consumer electronics suck as much as 25% of their power when not in use, according to the U.S. Department of Energy. Your PC grabs 85% when it's not in use.

Eleven watts even when powered down adds 66 cents to a typical Californian's monthly energy bill. These silent siphons of energy, known as phantom loads, add about $28 to the average annual household power bill, according to the energy department.

Because unplugging everything in your home and office is unrealistic, consider buying a SmartStrip, a power strip and surge protector that automatically cuts off power to devices that are shut down.

A top-of-the-line AA nickel metal hydride MaxE battery from Ansmann Energy, distributed in the U.S. by Horizon Battery, costs about $4 and can be recharged 1,000 times. At 3 cents in electricity per charge, the battery's total cost comes to about $34. By contrast, 1,000 disposable AA batteries costing 30 cents apiece would cost about $300.

(classic Bacsik)

Thursday, February 14, 2008

How Green Is Your Candidate?

Hillary Clinton (D): Key Points

• Proposes a Strategic Energy Fund that would raise $50 billion over 10 years by taxing the "excess profits" of oil companies and cutting their tax breaks. The money would be invested in "clean energy technologies," including renewable energy, energy efficiency, "clean coal," plug-in hybrids, cellulosic ethanol and other biofuels, and more."
• Supports reducing U.S. greenhouse-gas emissions 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050 via a cap-and-trade system that would auction off 100 percent of the emission permits as well as other measures.
• Made her campaign carbon-neutral in April 2007, one month after John Edwards did.
• Calls for the U.S. to cut its consumption of foreign oil by two-thirds of projected levels by 2030.
• Supports a goal to get 25 percent of the U.S. electricity supply from renewable sources by 2030.
• Supports raising fleet-wide fuel-economy standards to 40 miles per gallon by 2020 and 55 mpg by 2030.
• Supports coal-to-liquid fuels if they emit 20 percent less carbon over their lifecycle than conventional fuels. On June 19, 2007, voted in favor of an amendment that would provide loans for coal projects, including liquefied coal; the amendment did not pass.

Mike Huckabee (R): Key Points

• Places high priority on energy independence. On his campaign site, he says, "The first thing I will do as president is send Congress my comprehensive plan for energy independence. We will achieve energy independence by the end of my second term."
• Is not convinced that climate change is largely driven by human activity, but believes we should take steps to curb greenhouse-gas emissions anyway.
• Supports a mandatory, economy-wide cap-and-trade system to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions in the United States.
• Supports expansion of nuclear energy.
• Supports oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and offshore in U.S. waters, but says, "In the long term, we need to get off oil altogether."
• Supports raising fuel-economy standards for automobiles to 35 mpg by 2020.
• Emphasizes that there's a religious and moral imperative to conserve resources and protect the earth.

John McCain (R): Key Points
• Has said global warming would be one of three key issues for his presidency.
• Cosponsored the first bill in the Senate calling for mandatory reductions of greenhouse-gas emissions, in 2003. The 2007 version, the Climate Stewardship and Innovation Act, is less stringent than many other climate bills currently in Congress. It would cap global-warming emissions from utilities, industry, and transport at 2004 levels by 2012 and then gradually decrease emissions to about 30 percent of 2004 levels by 2050.
• Supports a cap-and-trade system for reducing greenhouse-gas emissions; opposes a carbon tax.
• Has been an outspoken critic of the Bush administration's lack of action against climate change.
• Believes the U.S. should embrace nuclear power as a way to generate energy without directly producing greenhouse-gas emissions. His 2007 Climate Stewardship and Innovation Act would take some of the money raised from auctioning emission allowances and make it available for loan guarantees for new nuclear power plants and R&D into new types of nuclear plants.
• Wants to "find a way to use our coal resources without emitting excessive greenhouse gases," and supports public-private partnerships to develop high-tech systems for coal gasification and carbon capture and storage.
• Used to criticize ethanol; now lauds ethanol, but still opposes government subsidies for it.
• Has opposed drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
• Has been endorsed by Republicans for Environmental Protection for his climate policies.

Barack Obama (D): Key Points

• Calls for cutting U.S. carbon dioxide emissions 80% below 1990 levels by 2050.
• Would channel revenue raised from auctioning emissions permits -- between $30 billion and $50 billion a year -- toward developing and deploying clean energy technology, creating "green jobs," and helping low-income Americans afford higher energy bills.
• Calls for 25 percent of U.S. electricity to come from renewable sources by 2025, and for 30 percent of the federal government's electricity to come from renewables by 2020.
• Proposes investing $150 billion over 10 years in R&D for renewables, biofuels, efficiency, "clean coal," and other clean tech.
• Calls for 36 billion gallons of biofuels to be used in the U.S. each year by 2022 and 60 billion gallons of biofuels to be used in the U.S. each year by 2030.
• Calls for all new buildings in the U.S. to be carbon neutral by 2030.
• Supports raising fuel-economy standards for automobiles to 40 miles per gallon and light trucks to 32 mpg by 2020.
• Cosponsor of the Boxer-Sanders Global Warming Pollution Reduction Act, the most stringent climate bill in the Senate.
•Cosponsor of the Coal-to-Liquid Fuel Promotion Act. After being badgered by MoveOn and other progressives over the issue, he "clarified" his position by saying he would support liquefied coal only if it emitted 20 percent less carbon over its lifecycle than conventional fuels.

Ron Paul (R): Key Points

• Does not consider climate change a major issue and is not convinced that it is largely caused by human activity.
• Says he would end all subsidies and special benefits to energy companies.
• Has voted in favor of offshore drilling and drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
•Has consistently opposed farm subsidies.




--Posted by Liz Fontana

Tuesday, February 12, 2008

ENERGY: Current biofuels create a 'Carbon Debt'!!











Two studies released February 7, 2008 (by the University of Minnesota and the Nature Conservancy; and Princeton University) determined that almost all biofuels produced today (particularly corn-based ethanol) produced more CO2 emissions than conventional petroleum when all production factors, especially land-use changes, are taken into account. Even though biofuels emit 50 to 95% less CO2 than conventional petroleum.

Holy rain forest destruction, batman!

Basically, many acres of farmland are being converted to products like corn for ethanol instead of for food and the slack has to be picked up somewhere. The studies suggested that the slack is picked up in places like South America and Asia where rain forest, peatland, and grasslands are being converted to crops.

Here's the kicker - the carbon, which is stored in the original plants and soil, is released as carbon dioxide. So much so that the carbon reduction benefit of the CO2 reduction can take hundreds of years to offset!!!

This "carbon debt" must be paid before the biofuels produced on the land can begin to lower greenhouse gas levels and have a positive effect on global warming.
The analysis calculated that a U.S. cornfield devoted to producing ethanol would have to be farmed for 167 years before it would begin to achieve a net reduction in emissions.

The conversion of peatlands for palm oil plantations in Indonesia ran up the greatest carbon debt, one that would require 423 years to pay off.

Researchers did note that some biofuels do not contribute to global warming because they do not require the conversion of native habitat. These include waste from agriculture and forest lands and native grasses and woody biomass grown on marginal lands unsuitable for crop production.

Some European countries (and Canada) are trying to fashion laws that restrict biofuel imports to those that were grown in an environmentally friendly manner. We'll be talking about the pros and cons of these laws later.

(classic Bacsik)

Wednesday, February 6, 2008

RECYCLING: Pilot Pen Launches Green Line

Pilot Pen Corporation has unveiled a line of earth-friendly writing instruments dubbed BeGreen.


Pilot says that the products, which include ballpoint pens, rolling balls pens and mechanical pencils, will sell for the same price as their non-recycled counterparts.

All are made from at least 70 percent recycled content and packaged in recycled materials. Retailers that will carry the green line include Office Depot, Office Max, Staples and Target.



(classic Bacsik)

Friday, February 1, 2008

ENERGY: Chevron Energy Solutions promotes solar energy in California

This appears to be a week of solar energy news, especially here in California. This article appeared in the Cable Directory, and highlights Chevron Energy Solutions commitment to advancing renewable energy sources. Some of the energy saving numbers are remarkable - hence the remarks!

Chevron Energy Solutions, a unit of Chevron Corporation, and the Contra Costa Community College District (CCCCD) today announced the completion of the first phase of the largest solar power installation ever constructed for an institution of higher learning in North America. The project is the highlight of a multi-facility energy efficiency and solar program that is expected to save CCCCD more than $70 million over 25 years.

The first phase is a 3.2-megawatt solar power generation system comprised of photovoltaic panels mounted on 34 parking canopies in six parking lots at Contra Costa College, Diablo Valley College and Los Medanos College (the project’s first phase, at 2.65 megawatts, is completed; the final phase will add 534 kilowatts in 2008).

The solar installation is expected to generate about four million kilowatt-hours of power each year, supplying up to half of CCCCD’s peak electricity needs.
This renewable power will offset the production of about 5.6 million pounds of carbon dioxide emissions annually – equivalent to removing 629 cars from the road or planting 636 acres of trees.

Additionally, the project will reduce grid power purchases of 7.4 million kilowatt-hours per year, enough to power about 1,200 homes.
(classic Bacsik)

A Green Energy Industry Takes Root in California

SAN FRANCISCO — The sun is starting to grow jobs.
While interest in alternative energy is climbing across the United States, solar power especially is rising in California, the product of billions of dollars in investment and mountains of enthusiasm.

In recent months, the industry has added several thousand jobs in the production of solar energy cells and installation of solar panels on roofs. A spate of investment has also aimed at making solar power more efficient and less costly than natural gas and coal.
Entrepreneurs, academics and policy makers say this era’s solar industry is different from what was tried in the 1970s, when Jerry Brown, then the governor of California, invited derision for envisioning a future fueled by alternative energy.

They point to companies like SolarCity, an installer of rooftop solar cells based in Foster City. Since its founding in 2006, it has grown to 215 workers and $29 million in annual sales. “It is hard to find installers,” said Lyndon Rive, the chief executive. “We’re at the stage where if we continue to grow at this pace, we won’t be able to sustain the growth.”

Click here to read the full NY Times article.